Home Blog Page 869

ALLEGED N271M FRAUD: EFCC counsel’s absence stalls Omatseye’s trial

0

By Innocent Anaba
Lagos—
A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos, has adjourned till October 21, 2015 for continuation of trial of the suspended Director General of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, NIMASA, Temisan Omatseye, who is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC over alleged N271 million fraud.
The adjournment was due to the absence of the lead prosecuting counsel, Mr Godwin Obla, SAN, who had written to the court of hisinability to be present in court.
Trial judge in the matter is Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia.
Obla, in the letter copied to Olushina Shofolayan, counsel to Omatseye, had stated that his wife was seriously sick in the United States of America.
Surprised at the yet-again request for adjournment from the prosecution lawyer, who was not represented by anybody from his chambers nor the EFCC, Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia, who noted that the court did not and had not received any request from the EFCC lawyer on the issue on ground frowned at the twist the trial was heading to.
The judge, however, granted their request while adjourning to October 21, 2015, a date, Omatseye pointed out was too long.
Obla, who opened his defense on June 1,2015, while cross examining the accused requested for an adjournment to July 1 to 2, 2015, on the ground that he needed to produce in court the NIMASA Procedural Manual which did or did not give  Omatseye the power to sign and endorse every contract document brought to his table.
Omatseye, while answering questions posed to him by the EFCC lawyer had pointed out that his signature had to be in every file document brought to him for approval.
Insisting that some documents in File PD16A before were missing, Omatseye said for a file to be complete, his signature has to be on that file, six times.
“My Lord, I had mentioned in my earlier statement that for a file to be complete, my signature must appear six times.”
Following his insistence on the missing files, Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia requested that he should single out the files that were missing in the court documents, to which he mentioned that some important files that lead to the final approval and scope of the contract are not in the court file.
“My Lord, even the approval letter, the contract form which had the scope of work is not in this file before me. Also not in this file are letter from the contractor requesting for payment after the contract must have been carried out; letter minuted to the executive director (ED) Finance; letter from the Audit Department to him as the DG of Nimasa for clearance and that from the maintenance department ascertaining if it was supplied and good for payment are all not in the file my lord,” Omatseye told the court.
File Lagos
Vanguard

Aba power tussle: Court offered Nnaji’s firm nothing to celebrate, Enugu Disco insists 0

0

 By CHRIS IWARAH
 Enugu Electricity Distribution Plc (EEDC) has described claims by Aba Power Limited (APL) and Geometric Power Limited (GPL) over some sections of its Aba, Abia State network as an attempt to misrepresent facts and stand truth on its head.
All reliefs sought by APL and GPL, which are promoted by former Minister of Power, Professor Bath Nnaji, in a suit they instituted at the Federal High Court over the matter, EEDC said, were refused by the trial judge.
The order of the court that Interstate Electrics Limited and EEDC should continue to recognise APL as tenants of EEDC in the “ring fenced” area, it claimed, was nothing to celebrate. The order, the company insisted, offered APL and GPL nothing to celebrate as it had no basis in law.
Giving a background to the dispute, EEDC said: “In 2011 the Federal Government through the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) advertised for Expression of Interest (EOI) for the sale of government shares in 17 of the 18 PHCN successor companies, that is six Gencos and Discos, including EEDC. Several companies participated in the bid process for the acquisition of EEDC. These included Interstate Electrics Limited and Eastern Electric Limited, a consortium which included APL.
“The information published by BPE for the transaction contained an inventory of assets of EEDC, which included all the assets in Aba ‘ring fenced’ area. The valuation of EEDC assets put at $209 million included the Aba assets and the offer price of $126 million for 60% equity in EEDC included the affected assets in the Aba ring fenced areas. Throughout the bid process there was no time APL or GPL raised any objection to the inclusion of the Aba ring fenced area as part of EEDC network area being offered to be transferred to private investors.
“It was only after a rigorous and most transparent bid process in which Interstate Electrics Limited emerged as the preferred bidder that GPL and APL started raising issues of the lease agreement for Aba area.
“Interstate Electrics made it clear to BPE during the negotiation of the Share Sale Agreement and Shareholders Agreement that the listed areas form part of the network area it bid and would pay for. In fact, the affected areas in Aba, which generate about 25% of EEDC revenue, could not have been glossed over by any discerning investor.”
An attempt by APL and GPL to restrain BPE from transferring the Aba ring fenced area, EEDC claimed, collapsed in court. The court, it said, also refused APL and GPL’s prayer to reverse the handover of the Ariaria and Aba business units.
Stressing that the Board of Directors of EEDC comprised credible local and international investors, including Sir Emeka Offor, former Senate President, Ken Nnamani, former Attorney-General of the Federation  and Minister of Justice, Prince Adetokunbo Kayode (SAN) and Robert Dickerman, the company said it had also sought the judicial pronouncement of the Court of Appeal on the order of the trial court that it should continue to recognise APL as its tenant, even though the order offered its opponents no “largesse” to celebrate.
Explaining that it was refraining from commenting on the legality of the “supplemental agreements” and “lease arrangement” GPL and APL had with the defunct National Electric Power Authority (NEPA) as the issue was already a subject of litigation, EEDC said it was, however, willing to buy all power generated by GPL at commercial rates.
Credit : The Sun

Lagos Tribunal dismisses Agbaje’s petition against Ambode

0

By Dapo Akinrefon & Olasunkanmi Akoni
Lagos—
Following the confirmation of his victory at the Election PetitionTtribunal, Governor Akinwunmi Ambode of Lagos State, yesterday called on the governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Mr Jimi Agbaje to join hands with him in moving the state forward.
Ambode also described the confirmation of his victory at the polls as a reaffirmation of the mandate given to him by the people of Lagos State.
But, the Lagos State chapter of PDP, in a swift reaction, has rejected the ruling which struck out its petition, describing it as a “miscarriage of justice and a monumental drawback in the dispensation of justice.”
The state election petition tribunal, yesterday struck out the petition filed against the election of Ambode of the All Progressives Congress, APC by Agbaje following a preliminary objection filed by the counsel to the APC candidate, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN).
Reacting to the ruling of the tribunal headed by Justice Mohammed Sirajo, the governor said, “I’m elated at the ruling of the tribunal which is an affirmation of my victory at the polls. On April 11, 2015, the people of Lagos spoke with their votes about continuity and that is what the tribunal has just reaffirmed”.
Calling on Agbaje to join hands with him to move the state forward, he said “The task ahead requires concerted efforts from everyone. I urge all my opponents to put the election struggles behind them and in the spirit of sportsmanship join hands with me to take Lagos to the next level.”
In a statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Habib Aruna, the governor noted that “It was needless in the first place for the PDP to have petitioned my election which was adjudged to be free, fair and credible. Now that the right thing has been done which of course the people expected, we should all come together above partisanship and move the state forward”
Olanipekun had argued at the resumed hearing on Thursday, June 25, that the petition should be struck out for being incompetent and that there was no correlation between the relief sought by the petitioner and the particulars of application on one hand and the grounds for questioning the election of Ambode on the other hand.
“The grounds and particulars in the petition are at opposites with the facts and reliefs being sought within the purview of Section 285(2) of the 1999 Constitution. I urge my Lordships to dismiss the petition,” Olanipekun had said.
He stated that there is nowhere in the pleadings where the petitioners attacked the victory of the respondents or questioned the conduct of the election, saying “I submit that there is no petition before your lordships known to law. There are no grounds challenging the election of my client under Section 138(b)(c) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.”
Lagos PDP rejects verdict
Meanwhile, the Lagos PDP has vowed to appeal the ruling said it as petitioned the National Judicial Commission, NJC, for “necessary disciplinary actions.”
In a statement by its publicity secretary, Mr Taofik Gani, the party lamented that “We are very jolted and embarrassed that our petition can die prematurely without it been heard on the merit.”
“We think there is a miscarriage of justice here. We are interested in the motive and motivators. The panel held that it had jurisdiction to hear our appeal; that our grounds are also competent. It however held that the petition had no life because it didn’t include a relief for re-election. This is supposed to be determined during the proper trial. We put as relief a declaration that we be returned as validly elected. The panel cannot dictate to us what relief to demand. Why should the Panel even expect a relief for re-rerun instead of declaration as winner?”.
It, however, vowed to challenge the tribunal ruling saying “we will not allow this miscarriage. Is this the change APC wants to give us in the judiciary.”
PDP pursuing a lost case — Lagos APC
Also reacting to the ruling, Lagos State APC, said the party did not expect anything less, as PDP is pursuing a lost case.
The party, however, stated that the dismissal of the case filed by Lagos PDP against Ambode has rested the inordinate ambition of PDP to steal Lagos by force.
Publicity Secretary of the party, Mr. Joe Igbokwe said “it is a well deserved victory by all standard. The people of Lagos have spoken and there is no going back. It is an affirmation of the peoples’ will and the PDP know it. PDP does not exist in Lagos.”
He said “We told them that Lagos is not for grabs but this party will not listen, and now they have been told that light and darkness have no meeting point. Millions of dollars and pound sterlings, OPC, and all the security agencies were massively deployed by Jonathan and PDP just to snatch Lagos but they failed.”
Igbokwe contended that PDP can never get anything near to the so-called votes they claimed to have scored in the last governorship elections in Lagos.
Vanguard

Legal Nigeria on bbm channel C0032737C

0

Feel free to join our bbm channel for exclusive legal news & more in the Nigerian Legal hemisphere.
BBM channel pin : C0032737C

Spread HIV/AIDS, go to jail, Ondo tells patients

0
From BAMIGBOLA GBOLAGUNTE, Akure
Ondo State Government has read out the riot act to HIV/AIDS patients in the state, declaring that any individual, who spread the disease within the state, will be jailed.
The government said the decision was in line with the existing HIV/AIDS Anti-stigma Law, which prescribed a 10-year jail term and a fine of N500,000 or both, for any person who by whatever means transmitted HIV/AIDS to another person.

Giving details of the law, which was signed last year, the Secretary to the State Government and Chairman, Ondo State Agency for the Control of AIDS (OSACA), Dr. Aderotimi Adelola, said stigmatization and discrimination could discourage individuals infected with HIV virus.
He stated that anybody, who discriminated against people living with HIV committed an offence and was liable to a fine of N100,000 or imprisonment of six months or both.
Adelola, who spoke during a sensitization programmes organized by OSACA in Akure, said: “Most times, the rights of people living with HIV/AIDS are violated, causing them to suffer the burden of the disease and the consequential loss of other rights.”
He stated that stigmatization and discrimination of people living with the virus may obstruct their access to treatment and also affect their employment, housing and other rights, which he said adversely, affected the vulnerability of others to be infected.
Also speaking, the state Commissioner for Information, Kayode Akinmade, said Ondo was the first state in the country to have a law that addressed many aspects of HIV/AIDS.
He said the law would help reduce the rate of HIV/AIDS transmission in the state just as he noted that the law would prevent transmission of the disease.
He added that the law would also guarantee protection of human rights and civil liberties for HIV/AIDS patients in the state.
“It has become an offence in Ondo Sate to have any form of discrimination against a person infected with HIV/AIDS virus in the case of employment, medical treatment, hiring, assignment, promotion, demotion, transfer, retirement, among others.”
“No educational institution in the state shall refuse admission, expel, discipline, segregate, and deny any pupil or prospective student right to any of his rights following perceived HIV.
The Sun

EFCC “shocked” by Fani-Kayode’sacquittal

0
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has said it was
shocked by Wednesday’s acquittal of former Minister of
Aviation, Femi Fani-Kayode.

A Federal High Court in Lagos acquitted Mr. Fani-Kayode of
corruption charges, sayingthe EFCC failed to prove its “feeble
case” against Mr. Fani-Kayode beyond reasonable doubt.
The spokesperson for the commission, Wilson Uwujaren, in a
statement, said the ruling by the judge, hon. Justice Rita Ofili- Ajumogobia,
was shocking.
Mr. Uwujaren said, “The Commission is making effort to obtain
a Certified True Copy of the ruling, to enable it respond
appropriately after careful review of the judgment.”
The trial against the former minister by the EFCC began in
2008, before Justice Ramat Mohammed, for allegedly laundering
about N100 million during his tenure as the Minister of Culture
and Tourism and then, aviation.
The allegedly laundered sum was, however, reduced to N2.1
million on Nov​ember 17, 2014 after the court dismissed 38 of
the 40-count charge levelled against Mr. Fani-Kayode for want
of proof.
The prosecuting counsel, Festus Keyamo, had urged the court to
uphold the remaining two counts and to accordingly convict Mr.
Fani-Kayode. He said the former minister failed to exonerate
himself of the allegations.
Mr. Keyamo pointed out that the object of the charge was that
Mr. Fani-Kayode transacted in cash sums above N500,000,
which was the threshold stipulated by the Money Laundering
(Prohibition) Act.
Mr. Keyamo had also argued that Mr. Fani-Kayode admitted
making such transactions in his confessional statement of
December 22, 2008 made to the EFCC.
He argued that the prosecution had discharged its duty once it
established that Mr. Fani-Kayode transacted in large sums
above the Money Laundering threshold, adding that it was left
for Mr. Fani-Kayode to explain the source of the money.
However, Mr. Fani-Kayode’s lawyer, Ifedayo Adedipe in his
summary argument, maintained that the former minister made
no confession to the EFCC. He said adding that the anti-graft
agency failed to show that Mr. Fani-Kayode actually accepted a
cash sum of N1million as alleged.
He said the anti-graft agency also failed to show to the court the
person who handed the cash sum to the accused person.
He said for the case of the prosecution to succeed, it had to be
proven beyond reasonable doubts.
Premium Times

BREAKING NEWS: Money laundry: Femi Fani-Kayode discharged, acquitted

0
The Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has discharged and acquitted the Former Minister of Aviation, Mr. Femi Fani-Kayode of alleged money laundering.
The court presides over by Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia held that the prosecution fail to prove their case beyound reasonable doubt.


Fani-Kayode was prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on allegation bordering on money laundering.

Details soon…
SUN

You’ll face full wrath of law, police tell killers of FUTA ex-VC

0
From BAMIGBOLA GBOLAGUNTE, Akure
Ondo State Commissioner of Police, Mr. Isaac Eke, has assured the people of the state that the suspected killers of the former Vice Chancellor, Federal University of Technology, Akure (FUTA), Prof. Albert Ilemobade, will face the full wrath of the law.
The police commissioner also promised that the killers of the university don, who were currently in detention would be charged to court for prosecution.

Eke, who spoke in Akure yesterday, noted that the suspected killers of the Ilemobade had confessed to the police their involvement in the death of the late university don, adding that, the law would take its full
course on their case.
The police boss, who expressed worry on the cause of the death of Ilemobade, said the suspects were evil-minded and should not be allowed to live among human beings.
On how the suspects were apprehended, Eke said the Ondo State Police Command received information from Ogun State Command that the professor’s security guard, Daniel Ita, and his former driver had been arrested with the deceased red Toyota Rav 4 sport utility vehicle (SUV) with registration number GGE-589-CF and acted promptly on the information.
Eke described the incident as traumatic and sad, saying the security guard was the brain behind the criminal act.
He assured that the police would ensure that the suspects were made to face the music, just as he warned other criminals in the state to desist from their devilish act.
The Sun

#SameSexMarraige: Nigerians react to Robert Mugabe’s ‘marriage proposal’ to Obama

0

If you are one of those wondering why 90-year old President of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe is trending on Nigerian Twitter, let’s update you.
Mugabe reportedly reacted to the legalisation of same sex marriage in the United States of America by seeking America’s President, Obama‘s hand in ‘marriage’.
The comments attributed to Mugabe have just gone viral online and reactions from different directions are trailing it. See what Twitter users are saying about it…
The Netng

Court adjourns Tinubu`s N150bn libel suit against AIT

0

Hon. Justice Iyabo Akinkugbe of an Ikeja high court, Tuesday June 30, adjourned
the suit to September 30, for further direction on the court processes served
by counsel to both parties in the suit.
LEADERSHIP makes reference to a report by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)
that Tinubu had instituted the suit against Daar Communications Plc, owners
of AIT, for airing of a documentary titled ‘lion of Bourdilion’, where he alleged
that the documentary was libelous and aimed at tarnishing his image.
Counsel to AIT, Mr Jeffery Kadiri, during the hearing on Tuesday, told the court
that he had filed all the necessary pleadings in the matter and in his response,
Tinubu’s counsel, Mr Ademola Adesiyun, asked the court in a motion dated
June 26 for extension of time in which to file a reply to AIT’s statement of
defence and counter-claim.
AIT listed its chairman emeritus, Chief Raymond Dokpesi, Namure Edoimioya,
Chief Medan Tenke, Ajibola Adewusi, Olumide Idowu, Chief Stanley Odidi, an
engineer, Mr Nwabueze and Dr Stanley Bassey, as witnesses in the case.
The television station denied every allegation of facts as contained in the
claimant’s amended statement of claim, with Dokpesi averring that Tinubu’s
claim was founded on a non-existent ground because the said documentary
was not titled ‘The Lion of Bourdilion’, but ‘Unmasking the Real Tinubu’.
AIT also claimed that, as a member of the fourth estate of the realm, was
empowered by Section 22 of the Constitution to at all times, hold those in
government accountable and responsible to the people of Nigeria, while their
boss further affirmed that the content of the documentary were facts which
had been in the public domain for over two decades.
Naij